Nothing says 25 years of TLK like art theft!
Apparently, a death in the family = free pass for reposting fanart.
I had not heard of this unsung rule.
It seems they have a bit of trouble keeping his name spelled right.
But hey, factory errors, even typos like these are more collectible! A harry potter first edition with title error goes upwards in the 6k$. And I’ve yet to get my copy of HTTYD book 8 with its typos, double-printed chapters, and missing context, appraised.
Hmm, now how did that quote from Socrates go again? Ah yes!
–“When the debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser.”
-Socrates
Woah what a great OC. She totally does not look like a Recolored Kiara from the second movie!
Isn’t that a puma? How can it be a lion king OC if it’s an American species? These people can’t seem to think these things through.
And honestly? I don’t have a problem with OCs that have been made on a traced base. I’ve occasionally used bases to test color palettes for OCs myself. And I’ve seen some pretty OCs be made on bases. It’s the kool-aid vomit and the extreme over the top design OCs that hurt my eyes.
The classic “But I didn’t trace!” “People can have coincidentally similar poses!” excuses. Esp when this person has proven they trace in their gallery. I’ve kicked them out of groups on dA because of it.
Thief gadget sellers have a new way to operate. They make sponsored ads and this kind of posts is not seen on their page. And these ads don’t have an option to file a DMCA report on them.
I don’t know who made this art but I’m 200% sure it’s stolen.
300% stolen. No idea who the original artist is, unfortunately. But this appears to be the original image.
