Wind swept hair when a lion is standing still. Awkweird.
With a neon nose like that, I doubt that really even is Kopa. Boy this crazy chika really hates a character that the fandom has deeply seeded as sub canon.

Someone’s trying to troll the TLK community.
Kopa isn’t Disney owned, he’s made simply for money as well as helping children learn to read. IE chapter books. A step up from story books. Although it’s not canon to the movies, people do like Kopa, be he canon or not. I dislike groups like this because you trounce on people’s imagination of sub canon characters. The way I see it, sub canon cubs like Malka, Tojo, Tama and the rest are simply there to help fuel your imagination, not spark fights.

This passes as a stamp on deviantART? It looks like they were trying to copy another stamp made by a deviant named Riza-Izumi
Now that is a stamp.
And get the whole list of facts this person put down for Kopa. It’s like they just thumbed through a wikia.
– –
you people need to learn the truth about kopa .
“ "Fluffy” was a boy. His name was originally going to be Chaka just as Kiara’s was going to be Shani. He even was going to be in the second movie. “
fluffy was not a boy or a girl. it was a genderless cub. and it’s name was always fluffy , and chaka is just a rumor , since disney had not shown us any concept art of him. it is true that kiara’s original name was Shani. and no boy was ever intended to be in the second movie.
” No, hes real. Disney made him. He is at the end of the movie, if you believe or not. HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE IN THE MOVIE 2 BUT THEY GOT A NEW IDEA. THATS REAL. “
no he isn’t real. Disney did not made kopa. one of my friends got a email and Alex Simmons , author of a tale of two brothers stated kopa was his creation all the way and not disneys. and the cub in the end of the first movie was a genderless cub named fluffy. and no he was never intended to be in the second movie , simply , because he never existed in the movie universe.
” Kopa is real if you look at the ears kopa has black rings like simbas and kiara doesn’t “
kopa is not real. it was genderless cub named fluffy. and far as the ear rims , sarabi has them too , is she a he now ? and baby simba didn’t have them as a baby. maybe fluffy inherited it’s ear rims from sarabi . simba didn’t get his ear rims until he was older.
” he has to exist there’s just… just… too much proof “
he doesn’t exist in the movie universe. and what proof do we have that he exists ?
” Kopa did exist. I believe that Simba is so protective of Kiara because Kopa was ‘killed’ by Zira. In my theory he’s not even dead. Simba says 'you can’t turn your back on them.’ what do you think that means? and Zazu said; 'nothing but a bunch of back-stabbing, MURDEROUS outsiders’ Murderous? If Kopa didn’t exist then Zazu wouldn’t be able to call them 'MURDEROUS’ outsiders. Because most people who don’t believe in Kopa think that they were exiled because they thought of Scar as king. °x° If they didn’t kill anyone, they wouldn’t be murderous, would they? Just my theory. “
zira never killed kopa , and zazu called the outsiders murderous because they were followers of scar , who WAS a murderer.
” i believe in the Kopa theories, and i believe Kopa really did exist. Ever noticed how Simba looks a lot older in TLK2? And that cub at the end of TLK looks NOTHING like Kiara. Just compare the piccies. You’ll see what i mean. “
the reason simba looks older is because he didn’t get older. the animators for the first movie and the second movie are different.
and the same goes for fluffy and kiara.
– –
Actually it was originally going to be a sister and brother duo named Chaka and Shani in the first draft of the TLK II script. They eventually dropped Chaka and changed Shani to Kiara.
She must be referring to the "E-mail” a notoriously obsessed TLKer got. I don’t trust what that person offers as they’ve been known to edit things and then pass them off as proof witout our knowledge.
In the original scripts of TLK, then named King of Beasts, Simba was to have a son. It was never named, but it was a son. They must have continued with that premise(thus the dark rimmed ears on the cub in the end of the first film), and by the time they wrote the script for the sequel they changed the name and gender for it.
Actually she’s pretty much right on this one. They are ruthless followers of Scar and will kill to please him. But the theories out there are just fun theories to expand the story to your liking.
Probably the only two things she’s right on. Simba is healthier in the sequel, fatter than his skinnier TLK I self too. He is not older.



